no end in sight for israel/lebanon conflict

July 31, 2006

President Bush today reiterated his desire for “a sustainable cease-fire, a cease-fire that will last” while rejecting pressure from UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and others to push for an immediate end to the conflict between Israel and Lebanon, now in its nineteenth. There will be no “stopping for the sake of stopping”, he said. He and other administration officials continue to insist that Hezbollah is a “root cause” of instability in the region, one that necessitates Israel’s continuing bombardment of the group’s assets within Lebanon.

At last Friday’s press conference, the president even went so far as to claim that a cease-fire “won’t solve the problem” and would not “help the Lebanese citizens have a life that is normal and peaceful,” a position that Washington Post columnist Dan Froomkin interprets as saying that “the Lebanese should be grateful that they are being bombed.”

The cost of the ongoing hostilities has been high. A temporary halt to aerial bombardment was called on Sunday after Israeli bombs destroyed an apartment building in the village of Qana, killing more than 50 civilians, but bombing resumed today (albeit with “reduced” intensity). Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert today dashed hopes of an immediate end to the crisis, stating, “there is no cease-fire and there will not be any cease-fire in the coming days.” Israeli columnist Nahum Barnea presents another perspective on Qana, writing, “We dropped leaflets telling them to leave….We covered ourselves….I, for one, am covered in shame….No leaflet is going to make those who have no where to go leave their homes.

Meanwhile, the White House backs a UN resolution calling for deployment of an international force to create a buffer between Hezbollah and Israel. “A multinational force must be dispatched to Lebanon quickly so we can help speed the delivery of humanitarian aid to the Lebanese people,” President Bush said today. Israel has said that it is unwilling to seek a cease-fire until such a force is in place, fearing the “rearming” of Hezbollah without the safety of a buffer zone in southern Lebanon.

But with civilian deaths mounting, can we really afford to wait that long? Israel may have a “right to defend itself,” but its refusal to seek an immediate resolution to the conflict in the face of the Qana tragedy and others highlights its own indifference to the humanitarian crises it has created. Worse, America’s continuing support of Israel against the prevailing sentiments of surrounding Arab nations and of major players like France and the UK perpetuates the increasingly real phenomenon of American arrogance. We call for humanitarian aid to Lebanon yet do nothing to address the cause of the suffering that now occurs on a daily basis. As Mr. Barnea says, “It’s life and death.” For a president who has time and again defended the right of human beings to live, the choice ought to be obvious.

–D. S. W.

Advertisements

5 Responses to “no end in sight for israel/lebanon conflict”

  1. Koby said

    “. We call for humanitarian aid to Lebanon yet do nothing to address the cause of the suffering that now occurs on a daily basis. ”

    Interesting comment becuase the “cause of the suffering” is Hezbullah actions againt Israel.
    Until Hezbullah is accounted for there will be no end to this war… maybe a cease fire for a couple of months until it can resupply with more deadly missiles.

    I find it funny that you bring the UK and France for moral support. Both these countries have over $50 billion in financial interests in this part of the world. A similar financial interest the US has in Israel. If you condem and challenge one you have to challenge the other.

    http://spheradic.blogspot.com/

  2. Jonathan Coveney said

    The timer ticks.

  3. David said

    Koby,

    The “cause of the suffering” is the continuing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and elswhere in the middle east. Hezbollah acted wrongly in initiating the crisis, but Israel is to be faulted as well for continuing their assault despite massive civilian casualties and the unlikelihood of real progress. As Nasrallah said, all Hezbollah has to do is survive; they probably will.

    Certainly France and Britain’s financial interests should be accounted for, but in this their interests are leading them to condemn a bloody war of attrition that continues to destabilize the region. America’s interests, by contrast, necessitate a more “hands off” approach that I find deeply troubling.

  4. What the media at large is not reporting is that Israel DID hold a ceasefire, allowing many to be transported to the north. When Hezbollah started shooting rockets again at Israel, it was THEN Israel responded.

    Humanitarian aid HAS gone into Lebanon, and distributed to the Red Cross. It has also gone to Syria, where many displaced people went. Ironically, aid has also been needed in Israel. This is not a one sided fight. Over 15 towns in Israel have been hit, some totally deserted. There are Israeli Jews and Arabs who have been killed and injured by both types of rockets AND ground fire.

    I think Golda Meir’s quote regarding palestinians also applies here: “There will be peace when they love their children more than they hate us.”

    Children as human shields by ANY people is reprehensible. I am saddened by the deaths of all of them.

  5. Freedom and terrorism are not synonymous.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: